[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230921183345.nbglbbbhh3g4hznl@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:33:45 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix detach call without attach
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:50:32PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> It's been reported that DSI host driver's detach can be called without
> the attach ever happening:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412073954.20601-1-tony@atomide.com/
>
> After reading the code, I think this is what happens:
>
> We have a DSI host defined in the device tree and a DSI peripheral under
> that host (i.e. an i2c device using the DSI as data bus doesn't exhibit
> this behavior).
>
> The host driver calls mipi_dsi_host_register(), which causes (via a few
> functions) mipi_dsi_device_add() to be called for the DSI peripheral. So
> now we have a DSI device under the host, but attach hasn't been called.
>
> Normally the probing of the devices continues, and eventually the DSI
> peripheral's driver will call mipi_dsi_attach(), attaching the
> peripheral.
>
> However, if the host driver's probe encounters an error after calling
> mipi_dsi_host_register(), and before the peripheral has called
> mipi_dsi_attach(), the host driver will do cleanups and return an error
> from its probe function. The cleanups include calling
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister().
>
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister() will call two functions for all its DSI
> peripheral devices: mipi_dsi_detach() and mipi_dsi_device_unregister().
> The latter makes sense, as the device exists, but the former may be
> wrong as attach has not necessarily been done.
>
> To fix this, track the attached state of the peripheral, and only detach
> from mipi_dsi_host_unregister() if the peripheral was attached.
>
> Note that I have only tested this with a board with an i2c DSI
> peripheral, not with a "pure" DSI peripheral.
>
> However, slightly related, the unregister machinery still seems broken.
> E.g. if the DSI host driver is unbound, it'll detach and unregister the
> DSI peripherals. After that, when the DSI peripheral driver unbound
> it'll call detach either directly or using the devm variant, leading to
> a crash. And probably the driver will crash if it happens, for some
> reason, to try to send a message via the DSI bus.
>
> But that's another topic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
-- Sebastian
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> index 14201f73aab1..843a6dbda93a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,8 @@ static int mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn(struct device *dev, void *priv)
> {
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(dev);
>
> - mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
> + if (dsi->attached)
> + mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
> mipi_dsi_device_unregister(dsi);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -370,11 +371,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_host_unregister);
> int mipi_dsi_attach(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> {
> const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->host->ops;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!ops || !ops->attach)
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> - return ops->attach(dsi->host, dsi);
> + ret = ops->attach(dsi->host, dsi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + dsi->attached = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_attach);
>
> @@ -386,9 +394,14 @@ int mipi_dsi_detach(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> {
> const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->host->ops;
>
> + if (WARN_ON(!dsi->attached))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (!ops || !ops->detach)
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> + dsi->attached = false;
> +
> return ops->detach(dsi->host, dsi);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_detach);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> index c9df0407980c..c0aec0d4d664 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
> * struct mipi_dsi_device - DSI peripheral device
> * @host: DSI host for this peripheral
> * @dev: driver model device node for this peripheral
> + * @attached: the DSI device has been successfully attached
> * @name: DSI peripheral chip type
> * @channel: virtual channel assigned to the peripheral
> * @format: pixel format for video mode
> @@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
> struct mipi_dsi_device {
> struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
> struct device dev;
> + bool attached;
>
> char name[DSI_DEV_NAME_SIZE];
> unsigned int channel;
>
> ---
> base-commit: 9fc75c40faa29df14ba16066be6bdfaea9f39ce4
> change-id: 20230921-dsi-detach-fix-6736f7a48ba7
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists