lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:45:29 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sh: machvec: remove custom ioport_{un,}map()

Hi!

On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 17:49 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023, at 17:41, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:30 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 16:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > 
> > > Right, it looks like the GENERIC_IOMAP part if gone from that
> > > series, and I also see that the PCI host bridge does not actually
> > 
> > No, 02/30 still enables it.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > > map the port I/O window. That's usually fine because very few
> > > drivers actually need it, and it also means that there should be
> > > no need for GENERIC_IOMAP or the simpler alternative.
> > > 
> > > The first version probably only did it accidentally, which is a
> > > common mistake, and I think the ones for hexagon, m68k, and
> > > mips can probably be removed as well with some simplifiations.
> > 
> > When not selecting GENERIC_IOMAP in v2, the build fails with:
> > 
> > sh4-linux-gnu-ld: lib/devres.o: in function `pcim_iomap_release':
> > devres.c:(.text+0x234): undefined reference to `pci_iounmap'
> 
> Odd, that one is provided based on CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
> and should be provided by common code, despite the similar
> naming this is unrelated to CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP.

So, what would be the suggestion now to move forward? Shall I include this
series for 6.7 or better wait until after Yoshinori's series to convert
to device tree has been merged?

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ