linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] params: Use sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQwOrCtkhVSikWhE@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 12:36:44 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] params: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 05:32:55PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:57:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 06:05:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show()
> > > should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the
> > > value to be returned to user space.
> > 
> > Any comments?
> 
> What tree were you taretting, looks sane to me.

I see that you was a person with last SoB in late patches in that area.
Whatever it went through in your case.

P.S. TBH I thought you have your own tree for things like this...

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko