linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: fix use-after-free of q->q_usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:21:10 -0700
From:   Saranya Muruganandam <saranyamohan@...gle.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Wensheng <zhangwensheng@...weicloud.com>,
        Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix use-after-free of q->q_usage_counter

Apologies for leaving out the stable release info.
This is for both 5.10 and patch applies cleanly for 5.15.

I just sent out a (different) modified patch for 6.1 LTS.


On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:26 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:20:12AM -0700, Saranya Muruganandam wrote:
> > From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> >
> > commit d36a9ea5e7766961e753ee38d4c331bbe6ef659b upstream.
> >
> > For blk-mq, queue release handler is usually called after
> > blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() returns. However, the
> > q_usage_counter->release() handler may not be run yet at that time, so
> > this can cause a use-after-free.
> >
> > Fix the issue by moving percpu_ref_exit() into blk_free_queue_rcu().
> > Since ->release() is called with rcu read lock held, it is agreed that
> > the race should be covered in caller per discussion from the two links.
> >
> > Backport-notes: Not a clean cherry-pick since a lot has changed,
> > however essentially the same fix.
> >
> > Reported-by: Zhang Wensheng <zhangwensheng@...weicloud.com>
> > Reported-by: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Y5prfOjyyjQKUrtH@T590/T/#u
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y4%2FmzMd4evRg9yDi@fedora/
> > Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
> > Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> > Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
> > Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcf ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path")
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215021629.74870-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> > Signed-off-by: Saranya Muruganandam <saranyamohan@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-core.c  | 2 --
> >  block/blk-sysfs.c | 2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> What stable kernel(s) are you expecting this backport to be applied to?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg "not a mind reader" k-h