[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52ba27b9-79d5-f9cc-450f-fe831e65769a@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:35:16 +0200
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mtd: parsers: ar7: remove support
On 22/9/23 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure it is wise to merge defconfig changes through mtd. Would
>> you mind sending this change aside to avoid potential conflicts? Each
>> patch can live on their own anyway.
>
> Yup, I can send a seperate patch for it.
>
>>> drivers/mtd/parsers/Kconfig | 5 --
>>> drivers/mtd/parsers/Makefile | 1 -
>>> drivers/mtd/parsers/ar7part.c | 129 ---------------------------------
>>
>> Do you have other changes related to this file in your tree? It failed
>> to apply on my side.
>
> No change. Plain v6.6-rc2. I used "--irreversible-delete", though. Maybe
> this is causing issues? As I stated in the cover-letter, I wonder if all
> this should go via MIPS. But there hasn't been any discussion about it
> yet.
MIPS tree for the whole series certainly makes sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists