linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mtd: parsers: ar7: remove support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230925091125.299caa92@xps-13>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:11:25 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mtd: parsers: ar7: remove support

Hi,

philmd@...aro.org wrote on Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:35:16 +0200:

> On 22/9/23 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >   
> >> I'm not sure it is wise to merge defconfig changes through mtd. Would
> >> you mind sending this change aside to avoid potential conflicts? Each
> >> patch can live on their own anyway.  
> > 
> > Yup, I can send a seperate patch for it.
> >   
> >>>   drivers/mtd/parsers/Kconfig    |   5 --
> >>>   drivers/mtd/parsers/Makefile   |   1 -
> >>>   drivers/mtd/parsers/ar7part.c  | 129 ---------------------------------  
> >>
> >> Do you have other changes related to this file in your tree? It failed
> >> to apply on my side.  
> > 
> > No change. Plain v6.6-rc2. I used "--irreversible-delete", though. Maybe
> > this is causing issues? As I stated in the cover-letter, I wonder if all
> > this should go via MIPS. But there hasn't been any discussion about it
> > yet.  
> 
> MIPS tree for the whole series certainly makes sense.

Then:

Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl