| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 21:41:01 +0200
From: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ata: libata: increase PMP SRST timeout to 10s
On 22/09/2023 20:59, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2023/09/22 11:47, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> On 22/09/2023 18:36, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 2023/09/22 9:18, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>>> On certain devices(*), this device probe failures for SATA disks after
>>>> wakeup from S2RAM, which often led to the disks not to be detected again.
>>>>
>>>> ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>>>>
>>>> (*) Observed for disks connected to the internal SATA controller of the
>>>> QNAP TS-453B, which is a "SATA controller: Intel Corporation
>>>> Celeron/Pentium Silver Processor SATA Controller (rev 06)".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> I'm sending this as an RFC, as I don't think it makes sense to increase the
>>>> timeout unconditionally - maybe it should be some kind of device quirk, if
>>>> there isn't any better fix.
>>>>
>>>> See text below for more information.
>>>>
>>>> include/linux/libata.h | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
>>>> index be2f0cee1601..9194030527b6 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
>>>> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ enum {
>>>> * advised to wait only for the following duration before
>>>> * doing SRST.
>>>> */
>>>> - ATA_TMOUT_PMP_SRST_WAIT = 5000,
>>>> + ATA_TMOUT_PMP_SRST_WAIT = 10000,
>>>>
>>>> /* When the LPM policy is set to ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER, there might
>>>> * be a spurious PHY event, so ignore the first PHY event that
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> I'm running plain Debian 12 rather than the QNAP OS (I believe the original
>>>> software does not support S2RAM at all). The issue I'm describing exists at
>>>> least since kernel 5.15; I've never run older kernels on this hardware. The
>>>> mainboard has 2 SATA controllers, both handled by the ahci driver:
>>>>
>>>> # lspci | grep SATA
>>>> 00:12.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Celeron/Pentium Silver Processor SATA Controller (rev 06)
>>>> 02:00.0 SATA controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. 106x SATA/RAID Controller (rev 01)
>>>>
>>>> The first two channels ata1 and ata2 are connected to the Intel controller,
>>>> while the ASMedia is responsible for ata3 through ata14. I have the same hard
>>>> drives connected to ata2, ata3, and ata4 (ata1 has a different model), and I'm
>>>> seeing the timeout issue after suspend only on ata1 and ata2, so it is specific
>>>> to the Intel controller rather than the drive model.
>>>>
>>>> On Debian's default 6.1.52 kernel, a wakeup looks like the following *in the
>>>> good case*, where all disks are successfully brought up again (unfortunately,
>>>> journald doesn't seem to have recorded correct timing information; roughly
>>>> 22 seconds pass between the "starting disk" and final "link up"). I have
>>>> redacted lines for the unused ata{5..14} ports for conciseness.
>>>>
>>>> ACPI: PM: Waking up from system sleep state S3
>>>> sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Starting disk
>>>> sd 3:0:0:0: [sdd] Starting disk
>>>> sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk
>>>> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
>>>> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata2: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> ata1: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>>>> ata2: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>>>> ata3: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>>>> ata4: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>>>> ata1: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> ata2: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata3: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> ata4: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>>>> ata2: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>>>> ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>>
>>>> On the same kernel, another wakeup might look like this:
>>>>
>>>> ACPI: PM: Waking up from system sleep state S3
>>>> sd 2:0:0:0: [sdd] Starting disk
>>>> sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Starting disk
>>>> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
>>>> sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk
>>>> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> ata3: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>>>> ata4: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>>>> ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> ata1: limiting SATA link speed to <unknown>
>>>> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> ata2: limiting SATA link speed to <unknown>
>>>> ata4: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> ata3: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 3F0)
>>>> ata1.00: disable device
>>>> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 3F0)
>>>> ata2.00: disable device
>>>> sd 1:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
>>>> sd 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
>>>> ata2.00: detaching (SCSI 1:0:0:0)
>>>> ata1.00: detaching (SCSI 0:0:0:0)
>>>> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Start/Stop Unit failed: Result: hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>>>> sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Start/Stop Unit failed: Result: hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>>>> sd 0:0:0:0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_resume+0x0/0x90 [scsi_mod] returns -5
>>>> sd 1:0:0:0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_resume+0x0/0x90 [scsi_mod] returns -5
>>>> sd 0:0:0:0: PM: failed to resume async: error -5
>>>> sd 1:0:0:0: PM: failed to resume async: error -5
>>>>
>>>> With my patch applied, the following log is generated instead:
>>>>
>>>> [ 63.748299] ACPI: PM: Waking up from system sleep state S3
>>>> [ 63.767111] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Starting disk
>>>> [ 63.767181] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdd] Starting disk
>>>> [ 63.776402] sd 0:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk
>>>> [ 63.776500] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
>>>> [ 69.121513] ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 69.125531] ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 69.133538] ata2: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 69.133557] ata1: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 73.803763] ata4: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>>>> [ 73.807805] ata3: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
>>>> [ 73.815780] ata2: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> [ 73.815800] ata1: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> [ 73.975799] ata2: softreset failed (device not ready)
>>>> [ 73.975813] ata1: softreset failed (device not ready)
>>>> [ 79.157124] ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 79.161116] ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 79.329119] ata1: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 79.329129] ata2: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> [ 80.781376] ata3: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> [ 80.792790] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> [ 80.837437] ata4: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> [ 80.843358] ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> [ 82.309565] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> [ 82.334217] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> [ 84.009745] ata1: found unknown device (class 0)
>>>> [ 84.169743] ata1: softreset failed (device not ready)
>>>> [ 85.425859] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> [ 85.486518] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>>
>>>> Compared to the previous "good" log
>>>> - ata1 and ata2 got "link is slow to respond" messages
>>>> - the "softreset failed" error changed from "1st FIS failed" to "device not
>>>> ready"
>>>> - I haven't seen any failures to bring up drives in 10+ wakeups, where it would
>>>> fail in roughly 1 out of 3 tries without the increased timeout
>>>>
>>>> I also saw the resume improvements going on in
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dlemoal/libata.git/, so next I
>>>> took kernel 6.5.4 and applied all patches from the for-6.6 and for-6.7 branches
>>>> from that repo on top. The first thing I noticed with this new kernel was a
>>>> regression:
>>>>
>>>> 16:24:25 : PM: suspend exit
>>>> 16:24:25 : ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> 16:24:25 : ata2.00: Entering active power mode
>>>> 16:24:25 : ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> 16:24:25 : ata1.00: Entering active power mode
>>>> 16:24:30 : ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> 16:24:30 : ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> 16:24:35 : ata2.00: qc timeout after 10000 msecs (cmd 0x40)
>>>> 16:24:35 : ata1.00: qc timeout after 10000 msecs (cmd 0x40)
>>>> 16:24:35 : ata1.00: VERIFY failed (err_mask=0x4)
>>>> 16:24:35 : ata2.00: VERIFY failed (err_mask=0x4)
>>>> 16:24:35 : ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> 16:24:35 : ata2: limiting SATA link speed to <unknown>
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata4: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata4.00: Entering active power mode
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata3: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata3.00: Entering active power mode
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>> 16:24:41 : ata1: limiting SATA link speed to <unknown>
>>>> 16:24:47 : ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 3F0)
>>>> 16:24:47 : ata1.00: disable device
>>>> 16:24:47 : ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 3F0)
>>>> 16:24:47 : ata2.00: disable device
>>>> 16:24:47 : ata1.00: detaching (SCSI 0:0:0:0)
>>>> 16:24:47 : ata2.00: detaching (SCSI 1:0:0:0)
>>>>
>>>> For the ASMedia controller, the new kernel fixes the "COMRESET failed" messages,
>>>> but on the Intel controller, two new errors have appeared ("qc timeout" and
>>>> "VERIFY failed"), and my drives are missing again.
>>>
>>> These errors are being address by a series that is about to be applied:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/yq134z7577n.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com/T/#m255ef5cc9b64b971765e8b6551aacee860fd1325
>>>
>>> This series addresses various issues with libata resume, including what you are
>>> seeing above, which causes the drives to fail resume and disappear, or worth, a
>>> hang on resume. Could you please try to apply these patches and test with them ?
>>> The "link is slow to respond" message is fairly normal and overall, there is up
>>> to 1min timeout before giving up on the drive. So this should not be an issue.
>>>
>>> If you still see a problem with your system, we can increase the timeout to
>>> avoid that "1st FIS failed" error.
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply!
>>
>> My previous test contained an older version of that patch series (from your
>> for-6.7 branch), I've updated to v5 now.
>>
>> I've not seen the "qc timeout" or "VERIFY failed" again with the new build
>> even if I don't set libata.ata_probe_timeout=30. I'm not sure whether that
>> was a one-time fluke or it was fixed between versions of the patch series;
>> I'll report back if I ever see that error again.
>>
>> Your series definitely improves wakeup behavior - I'm still seeing the "1st
>> FIS failed", but the drives seem to come up reliably regardless.
>>
>> Feel free to add
>> Tested-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
>> for the whole series.
>>
>> Even with the latest series applied, I still need my
>> ATA_TMOUT_PMP_SRST_WAIT change to avoid the "softreset failed (1st FIS
>> failed)" message (and get "softreset failed (device not ready)" instead).
>
> OK. Thank you for testing.
> For increasing the timeout, please send a proper patch. I will queue it.
>
>
Will do. Do you see any downsides to the increased timeout? Otherwise, I'd
simply add a Fixes: tag for the last time the timeout was touched in
e7d3ef13d52a126438f687a1a32da65ff926ed57.
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists