linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ALSA: cs35l41: prevent old firmwares using unsupported commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871qeqcl89.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:53:58 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        'Jaroslav Kysela' <perex@...ex.cz>,
        'Takashi Iwai' <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ALSA: cs35l41: prevent old firmwares using unsupported commands

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:48:03 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:44:30PM +0100, Stefan Binding wrote:
> 
> > > So those are fixes needed for 6.6 kernel?  Or they are something
> > new?
> 
> > These are to fix the issue that was reported on the Lenovo Legion 7
> > 16ACHg6,
> > which was introduced after the fixes to CS35L41 HDA System Suspend.
> 
> Could you be more specific about which fixes these are and which tree
> they're in?  If they're fixes then I don't have anything queued for 6.6
> so I'm confused about why you say there's a dependency on my tree.

Yeah.  The suspend fix has been landed in 6.6-rc1, so it's for 6.6, I
suppose.

Stefan, if it's a fix for a known commit, please put Fixes tag at the
next time.


thanks,

Takashi