linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ALSA: cs35l41: prevent old firmwares using unsupported commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8adda3b7-90f0-4d0b-b990-669a591becad@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:48:03 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     'Takashi Iwai' <tiwai@...e.de>, 'Jaroslav Kysela' <perex@...ex.cz>,
        'Takashi Iwai' <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ALSA: cs35l41: prevent old firmwares using
 unsupported commands

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:44:30PM +0100, Stefan Binding wrote:

> > So those are fixes needed for 6.6 kernel?  Or they are something
> new?

> These are to fix the issue that was reported on the Lenovo Legion 7
> 16ACHg6,
> which was introduced after the fixes to CS35L41 HDA System Suspend.

Could you be more specific about which fixes these are and which tree
they're in?  If they're fixes then I don't have anything queued for 6.6
so I'm confused about why you say there's a dependency on my tree.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)