[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230923005404.3633619-1-make_ruc2021@163.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:54:04 +0800
From: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@....com>
To: davidgow@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] list: test: potential dereference of null pointer
To avoid the failure of alloc, we could check the return value of
kmalloc() and kzalloc().
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@....com>
---
lib/list-test.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c
index 0cc27de9cec8..a0b478042477 100644
--- a/lib/list-test.c
+++ b/lib/list-test.c
@@ -26,10 +26,12 @@ static void list_test_list_init(struct kunit *test)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list2);
- list4 = kzalloc(sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ list4 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, list4);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(list4);
list5 = kmalloc(sizeof(*list5), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, list5);
memset(list5, 0xFF, sizeof(*list5));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(list5);
@@ -40,7 +42,6 @@ static void list_test_list_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(list4));
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(list5));
- kfree(list4);
kfree(list5);
}
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists