lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2023 11:56:25 +0000
From:   "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>
To:     Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
CC:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: virtcrypto_dataq_callback calls crypto_finalize_request() from
 irq context

Hi Halil,

Commit 4058cf08945 introduced a check for detecting crypto completion function 
called with enable BH, and indeed the virtio-crypto driver didn't disable BH, which needs
a patch to fix it.

P.S.: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220221120833.2618733-5-clabbe@baylibre.com/T/

Regards,
-Gonglei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Halil Pasic [mailto:pasic@...ux.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 9:46 PM
> To: Gonglei (Arei) <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>
> Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>; Herbert Xu
> <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>; Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>;
> Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>;
> virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org; Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@...ux.ibm.com>
> Subject: BUG: virtcrypto_dataq_callback calls crypto_finalize_request() from irq
> context
> 
> Hi Gonglei!
> 
> Our CI has found that virtio-crypto does not honor the requirement of
> crypto_finalize_request() being called in softirq context which is asserted in
> that function via lockdep_assert_in_softirq() since commit 4058cf08945c
> ("crypto: engine - check if BH is disabled during completion").
> 
> The problem was originally found on s390x but Marc Hartmayer was so kind to
> reproduce it on amd64. Please find the corresponding kernel messages at the
> end of this email.
> 
> The call chain looks like this.
> interrupt handler for queue notification  --> virtcrypto_dataq_callback()  -->
> via vc_req->alg_cb either virtio_crypto_skcipher_finalize_req()
>      or virtio_crypto_akcipher_finalize_req()
>  --> crypto_finalize_skcipher_request()
>      or crypto_finalize_akcipher_request()
>  --> crypto_finalize_request()
> 
> Everything above is happening in the interrupt handler (and in "hard" irq
> context).
> 
> I'm not really familiar with the implementation of virtio_crypto or with the
> crypto_engine interfaces. I assume the problem is on the side of virtio-crypto
> so I would like to kindly ask you as the maintainer of virtio-crypt to have a look
> at it. But if you think it is rather in the crypto_engine, please clarify that with
> Herbert. I have no strong opinion on this issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Halil
> 
> [ 31.033415][ C0] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 136 at crypto/crypto_engine.c:58
> crypto_finalize_request (crypto/crypto_engine.c:58 (discriminator 23))
> crypto_engine
> [   31.034131][    C0] Modules linked in: virtio_crypto(+)
> vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common(+) crypto_engine vsock
> [   31.035326][    C0] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
> 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014
> [ 31.035917][ C0] RIP: 0010:crypto_finalize_request (crypto/crypto_engine.c:58
> (discriminator 23)) crypto_engine [ 31.036398][ C0] Code: 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d
> e9 bf 88 1c c1 65 8b 05 b0 36 01 40 f6 c4 ff 74 12 a9 00 00 0f 00 75 0b a9 00 00
> f0 00 0f 84 54 ff ff ff <0f> 0b e9 4d ff ff ff 4c 8d 6b 38 4c 89 ef e8 8e 47 1b c4 48
> 8d bb All code ========
>    0:	08 5b 5d             	or     %bl,0x5d(%rbx)
>    3:	41 5c                	pop    %r12
>    5:	41 5d                	pop    %r13
>    7:	e9 bf 88 1c c1       	jmp    0xffffffffc11c88cb
>    c:	65 8b 05 b0 36 01 40 	mov    %gs:0x400136b0(%rip),%eax
> # 0x400136c3
>   13:	f6 c4 ff             	test   $0xff,%ah
>   16:	74 12                	je     0x2a
>   18:	a9 00 00 0f 00       	test   $0xf0000,%eax
>   1d:	75 0b                	jne    0x2a
>   1f:	a9 00 00 f0 00       	test   $0xf00000,%eax
>   24:	0f 84 54 ff ff ff    	je     0xffffffffffffff7e
>   2a:*	0f 0b                	ud2		<-- trapping instruction
>   2c:	e9 4d ff ff ff       	jmp    0xffffffffffffff7e
>   31:	4c 8d 6b 38          	lea    0x38(%rbx),%r13
>   35:	4c 89 ef             	mov    %r13,%rdi
>   38:	e8 8e 47 1b c4       	call   0xffffffffc41b47cb
>   3d:	48                   	rex.W
>   3e:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
>   3f:	bb                   	.byte 0xbb
> 
> Code starting with the faulting instruction
> ===========================================
>    0:	0f 0b                	ud2
>    2:	e9 4d ff ff ff       	jmp    0xffffffffffffff54
>    7:	4c 8d 6b 38          	lea    0x38(%rbx),%r13
>    b:	4c 89 ef             	mov    %r13,%rdi
>    e:	e8 8e 47 1b c4       	call   0xffffffffc41b47a1
>   13:	48                   	rex.W
>   14:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
>   15:	bb                   	.byte 0xbb
> [   31.037591][    C0] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000007da0 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [   31.037976][    C0] RAX: 0000000080010002 RBX: ffff888006c87428 RCX:
> 1ffffffff0c0e523
> [   31.038471][    C0] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810d0819e8 RDI:
> ffff888006c87449
> [   31.038967][    C0] RBP: ffff88810d0819e8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> fffffbfff0b04f04
> [   31.039463][    C0] R10: ffffffff85827823 R11: ffffffff842013e6 R12:
> 0000000000000000
> [   31.039963][    C0] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88810d081a18 R15:
> dffffc0000000000
> [   31.040475][    C0] FS:  00007f80c0cc6800(0000)
> GS:ffff88811ae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   31.041058][    C0] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
> 0000000080050033
> [   31.041473][    C0] CR2: 00007f22ad455270 CR3: 0000000106b22000
> CR4: 00000000000006f0
> [   31.042024][    C0] Call Trace:
> [   31.042250][    C0]  <IRQ>
> [ 31.042433][ C0] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:673) [ 31.042710][ C0] ?
> crypto_finalize_request (crypto/crypto_engine.c:58 (discriminator 23))
> crypto_engine [ 31.043161][ C0] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:180 lib/bug.c:219)
> [ 31.043451][ C0] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:237 (discriminator 1))
> [ 31.043728][ C0] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:258 (discriminator
> 1)) [ 31.044039][ C0] ? asm_exc_invalid_op
> (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:568)
> [ 31.044385][ C0] ? asm_common_interrupt
> (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:636)
> [ 31.044746][ C0] ? crypto_finalize_request (crypto/crypto_engine.c:58
> (discriminator 23)) crypto_engine [ 31.045202][ C0] virtcrypto_dataq_callback
> (drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c:91) virtio_crypto [ 31.045661][ C0] ?
> __pfx_virtcrypto_dataq_callback (drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c:76)
> virtio_crypto [ 31.046148][ C0] ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock
> (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:113)
> [ 31.046499][ C0] vring_interrupt (drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2598)
> [ 31.046806][ C0] vp_vring_interrupt (drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:67
> (discriminator 2)) [ 31.047125][ C0] ? __pfx_vp_vring_interrupt
> (drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:60)
> [ 31.047477][ C0] __handle_irq_event_percpu (kernel/irq/handle.c:158)
> [ 31.047845][ C0] handle_irq_event (kernel/irq/handle.c:195
> kernel/irq/handle.c:210) [ 31.048147][ C0] handle_edge_irq
> (kernel/irq/chip.c:833) [ 31.048454][ C0] __common_interrupt
> (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:271) [ 31.048767][ C0] common_interrupt
> (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 (discriminator 47))
> [   31.049071][    C0]  </IRQ>
> [   31.049273][    C0]  <TASK>
> [ 31.049468][ C0] asm_common_interrupt
> (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:636)
> [ 31.049805][ C0] RIP: 0010:unwind_next_frame
> (arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c:494)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ