[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZRGuUSkwKqeZ3+ot@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:59:13 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, broonie@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/sysreg: Move TRFCR definitions to sysreg
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:21:14AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> Add separate definitions for ELx and EL2 as TRFCR_EL1 doesn't have CX.
> This also mirrors the previous definition so no code change is required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
I assume these patches would go in via the coresight tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
