[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70867968-55c1-a1f2-58d5-cc332b4a51df@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:37:33 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, broonie@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/sysreg: Move TRFCR definitions to sysreg
On 25/09/2023 16:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:21:14AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> Add separate definitions for ELx and EL2 as TRFCR_EL1 doesn't have CX.
>> This also mirrors the previous definition so no code change is required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
> I assume these patches would go in via the coresight tree.
Possibly, but I'm working on a V4 that combines the nVHE version and
Suzuki's comment from here [1]. There will be more kvm patches in that
one so I'm not sure.
[1]:
https://lists.linaro.org/archives/list/coresight@lists.linaro.org/message/A6OVUHKZZXJZG5MQ2T7VYHBAD6NOSBD7/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists