[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUht_JQKW8ekDCpHyRbdVe168nmLGrWU21aZDYSyDeMQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:08:18 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf kwork: Fix spelling mistake "Captuer" -> "Capture"
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 10:50 PM Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There is a spelling mistake in a pr_debug message. Fix it.
> (I didn't see this one in the first spell check scan I ran).
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
> index 7e8dd35d764b..f007a9b27065 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
> @@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ static void sig_handler(int sig)
> * Simply capture termination signal so that
> * the program can continue after pause returns
> */
> - pr_debug("Captuer signal %d\n", sig);
> + pr_debug("Capture signal %d\n", sig);
> }
>
> static int perf_kwork__report_bpf(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists