[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230925055037.18089-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 06:50:37 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] perf kwork: Fix spelling mistake "Captuer" -> "Capture"
There is a spelling mistake in a pr_debug message. Fix it.
(I didn't see this one in the first spell check scan I ran).
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
index 7e8dd35d764b..f007a9b27065 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
@@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ static void sig_handler(int sig)
* Simply capture termination signal so that
* the program can continue after pause returns
*/
- pr_debug("Captuer signal %d\n", sig);
+ pr_debug("Capture signal %d\n", sig);
}
static int perf_kwork__report_bpf(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists