[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZRIDc_x9Qh5EJNC8@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:02:27 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <alice@...l.io>
Cc: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: arc: remove `ArcBorrow` in favour of
`WithRef`
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:58:46PM +0200, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On 9/25/23 23:55, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 09:03:52PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> > > On 25.09.23 20:51, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:00:45PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> > > > > On 25.09.23 18:16, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:07:44PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> > > > > > > ```rust
> > > > > > > struct MutatingDrop {
> > > > > > > value: i32,
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > impl Drop for MutatingDrop {
> > > > > > > fn drop(&mut self) {
> > > > > > > self.value = 0;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > let arc = Arc::new(MutatingDrop { value: 42 });
> > > > > > > let wr = arc.as_with_ref(); // this creates a shared `&` reference to the MutatingDrop
> > > > > > > let arc2: Arc<MutatingDrop> = wr.into(); // increments the reference count to 2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More precisely, here we did a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > &WithRef<_> -> NonNull<WithRef<_>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > conversion, and later on, we may use the `NonNull<WithRef<_>>` in
> > > > > > `drop` to get a `Box<WithRef<_>>`.
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can we workaround this issue by (ab)using the `UnsafeCell` inside
> > > > `WithRef<T>`?
> > > >
> > > > impl<T: ?Sized> From<&WithRef<T>> for Arc<T> {
> > > > fn from(b: &WithRef<T>) -> Self {
> > > > // SAFETY: The existence of the references proves that
> > > > // `b.refcount.get()` is a valid pointer to `WithRef<T>`.
> > > > let ptr = unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(b.refcount.get().cast::<WithRef<T>>()) };
> > > >
> > > > // SAFETY: see the SAFETY above `let ptr = ..` line.
> > > > ManuallyDrop::new(unsafe { Arc::from_inner(ptr) })
> > > > .deref()
> > > > .clone()
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > This way, the raw pointer in the new Arc no longer derives from the
> > > > reference of `WithRef<T>`.
> > >
> > > No, the code above only obtains a pointer that has provenance valid
> > > for a `bindings::refcount_t` (or type with the same layout, such as
> > > `Opaque<bindings::refcount_t>`). But not the whole `WithRef<T>`, so accessing
> > > it by reading/writing will still be UB.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm... but we do the similar thing in `Arc::from_raw()`, right?
> >
> > pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *const T) -> Self {
> > ..
> > }
> >
> > , what we have is a pointer to T, and we construct a pointer to
> > `ArcInner<T>/WithRef<T>`, in that function. Because the `sub` on pointer
> > gets away from provenance? If so, we can also do a sub(0) in the above
> > code.
>
> Not sure what you mean. Operations on raw pointers leave provenance
> unchanged.
Let's look at the function from_raw(), the input is a pointer to T,
right? So you only have the provenance to T, but in that function, the
pointer is casted to a pointer to WithRef<T>/ArcInner<T>, that means you
have the provenance to the whole WithRef<T>/ArcInner<T>, right? My
question is: why isn't that a UB?
Regards,
Boqun
>
> Alice
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists