[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfvmED4ZsmrH4B6m9kGsH=68-zjQd5JMszb6UBTtbF0bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:07:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com, chenhuiz@...s.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: imu: mpu6050: add level shifter flag
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:26 AM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> wrote:
>
> Some boards fail in magnetometer probe if flag is not set.
Which flag? Can you elaborate a bit more?
Does it deserve the Fixes tag?
...
> unsigned int val;
> int ret;
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(st->map, 0x1, 0x80,
> + st->level_shifter ? 0x80 : 0);
This is a bit cryptic, what does 1 stand for?
Also
unsigned int mask = BIT(7);
...
val = st->level_shifter ? mask : 0;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
...
> + st->level_shifter = device_property_present(dev,
> + "invensense,level-shifter");
It was a recommendation to use _read_bool() when reading the value,
while the result will be the same.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists