[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZRLBWrjUadvGCs/y@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:32:42 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_omap: Fix errors with no_console_suspend
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:13:17AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We now get errors on system suspend if no_console_suspend is set as
> reported by Thomas. The errors started with commit 20a41a62618d ("serial:
> 8250_omap: Use force_suspend and resume for system suspend").
>
> Let's fix the issue by checking for console_suspend_enabled in the system
> suspend and resume path.
>
> Note that with this fix the checks for console_suspend_enabled in
> omap8250_runtime_suspend() become useless. We now keep runtime PM usage
> count for an attached kernel console starting with commit bedb404e91bb
> ("serial: 8250_port: Don't use power management for kernel console").
...
Btw, how close are we to getting rid the pm_runtime_irq_safe() call?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists