lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpR9LXJqE7bh9aTyZ8Z6mArvoi2YE_0v57wz3fmq9OP2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 17:03:27 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@...soc.com>
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wenchao.chen666@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
        zhenxiong.lai@...soc.com, yuelin.tang@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] mmc: hsq: dynamically adjust hsq_depth to improve performance

On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 09:47, Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@...soc.com> wrote:
>
> Change in v4:
> - Remove "struct hsq_slot *slot" and simplify the code.
> - In general, need_change has to be greater than or equal to 2 to allow the threshold
>   to be adjusted.
>
> Change in v3:
> - Use "mrq->data->blksz * mrq->data->blocks == 4096" for 4K.
> - Add explanation for "HSQ_PERFORMANCE_DEPTH".
>
> Change in v2:
> - Support for dynamic adjustment of hsq_depth.
>
> Test
> =====
> I tested 3 times for each case and output a average speed.
> Ran 'fio' to evaluate the performance:
> 1.Fixed hsq_depth
> 1) Sequential write:
> Speed: 168 164 165
> Average speed: 165.67MB/S
>
> 2) Sequential read:
> Speed: 326 326 326
> Average speed: 326MB/S
>
> 3) Random write:
> Speed: 82.6 83 83
> Average speed: 82.87MB/S
>
> 4) Random read:
> Speed: 48.2 48.3 47.6
> Average speed: 48.03MB/S
>
> 2.Dynamic hsq_depth
> 1) Sequential write:
> Speed: 167 166 166
> Average speed: 166.33MB/S
>
> 2) Sequential read:
> Speed: 327 326 326
> Average speed: 326.3MB/S
>
> 3) Random write:
> Speed: 86.1 86.2 87.7
> Average speed: 86.67MB/S
>
> 4) Random read:
> Speed: 48.1 48 48
> Average speed: 48.03MB/S
>
> Based on the above data, dynamic hsq_depth can improve the performance of random writes.
> Random write improved by 4.6%.
>
> In addition, we tested 8K and 16K.
> 1.Fixed hsq_depth
> 1) Random write(bs=8K):
> Speed: 116 114 115
> Average speed: 115MB/S
>
> 2) Random read(bs=8K):
> Speed: 83 83 82.5
> Average speed: 82.8MB/S
>
> 3) Random write(bs=16K):
> Speed: 141 142 141
> Average speed: 141.3MB/S
>
> 4) Random read(bs=16K):
> Speed: 132 132 132
> Average speed: 132MB/S
>
> 2.Dynamic hsq_depth(mrq->data->blksz * mrq->data->blocks == 8192 or 16384)
> 1) Random write(bs=8K):
> Speed: 115 115 115
> Average speed: 115MB/S
>
> 2) Random read(bs=8K):
> Speed: 82.7 82.9 82.8
> Average speed: 82.8MB/S
>
> 3) Random write(bs=16K):
> Speed: 143 141 141
> Average speed: 141.6MB/S
>
> 4) Random read(bs=16K):
> Speed: 132 132 132
> Average speed: 132MB/S
>
> Increasing hsq_depth cannot improve 8k and 16k random read/write performance.
> To reduce latency, we dynamically increase hsq_depth only for 4k random writes.
>
> Test cmd
> =========
> 1)write: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=write -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 2)read: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=read -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 3)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 4)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 5)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=8K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 6)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=8K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 7)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=16K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
> 8)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=16K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
>
> Wenchao Chen (2):
>   mmc: queue: replace immediate with hsq->depth
>   mmc: hsq: dynamic adjustment of hsq->depth
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c   |  6 +-----
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/mmc/host.h   |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

The series applied for next! I took the liberty of making some updates
to the commit messages and a small adjustment of the code in patch2.
Please have a look and yell at me if there is something that looks
odd!

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ