| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e78da512-f8b4-6740-cb40-cac226c008bf@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:36:10 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope
Hi Tony,
On 8/29/23 18:44, Tony Luck wrote:
> Legacy resctrl features operated on subsets of CPUs in the system with
> the defining attribute of each subset being an instance of a particular
> level of cache. E.g. all CPUs sharing an L3 cache would be part of the
> same domain.
>
> In preparation for features that are scoped at the NUMA node level
> change the code from explicit references to "cache_level" to a more
> generic scope. At this point the only options for this scope are groups
> of CPUs that share an L2 cache or L3 cache.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 9 ++++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 15 ++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 15 ++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index 8334eeacfec5..2db1244ae642 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -144,13 +144,18 @@ struct resctrl_membw {
> struct rdt_parse_data;
> struct resctrl_schema;
>
> +enum resctrl_scope {
> + RESCTRL_L3_CACHE,
> + RESCTRL_L2_CACHE,
> +};
How about?
enum resctrl_scope {
RESCTRL_L2_CACHE = 2,
RESCTRL_L3_CACHE,
};
I think this will simplify lot of your code below. You can directly use
scope as it is done now.
> +
> /**
> * struct rdt_resource - attributes of a resctrl resource
> * @rid: The index of the resource
> * @alloc_capable: Is allocation available on this machine
> * @mon_capable: Is monitor feature available on this machine
> * @num_rmid: Number of RMIDs available
> - * @cache_level: Which cache level defines scope of this resource
> + * @scope: Scope of this resource
> * @cache: Cache allocation related data
> * @membw: If the component has bandwidth controls, their properties.
> * @domains: All domains for this resource
> @@ -168,7 +173,7 @@ struct rdt_resource {
> bool alloc_capable;
> bool mon_capable;
> int num_rmid;
> - int cache_level;
> + enum resctrl_scope scope;
> struct resctrl_cache cache;
> struct resctrl_membw membw;
> struct list_head domains;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 030d3b409768..0d3bae523ecb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> .r_resctrl = {
> .rid = RDT_RESOURCE_L3,
> .name = "L3",
> - .cache_level = 3,
> + .scope = RESCTRL_L3_CACHE,
> .domains = domain_init(RDT_RESOURCE_L3),
> .parse_ctrlval = parse_cbm,
> .format_str = "%d=%0*x",
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> .r_resctrl = {
> .rid = RDT_RESOURCE_L2,
> .name = "L2",
> - .cache_level = 2,
> + .scope = RESCTRL_L2_CACHE,
> .domains = domain_init(RDT_RESOURCE_L2),
> .parse_ctrlval = parse_cbm,
> .format_str = "%d=%0*x",
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> .r_resctrl = {
> .rid = RDT_RESOURCE_MBA,
> .name = "MB",
> - .cache_level = 3,
> + .scope = RESCTRL_L3_CACHE,
> .domains = domain_init(RDT_RESOURCE_MBA),
> .parse_ctrlval = parse_bw,
> .format_str = "%d=%*u",
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> .r_resctrl = {
> .rid = RDT_RESOURCE_SMBA,
> .name = "SMBA",
> - .cache_level = 3,
> + .scope = RESCTRL_L3_CACHE,
> .domains = domain_init(RDT_RESOURCE_SMBA),
> .parse_ctrlval = parse_bw,
> .format_str = "%d=%*u",
> @@ -487,6 +487,21 @@ static int arch_domain_mbm_alloc(u32 num_rmid, struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int get_domain_id_from_scope(int cpu, enum resctrl_scope scope)
> +{
> + switch (scope) {
> + case RESCTRL_L3_CACHE:
> + return get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, 3);
> + case RESCTRL_L2_CACHE:
> + return get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, 2);
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
You may not need this code with new definition of resctrl_scope.
> /*
> * domain_add_cpu - Add a cpu to a resource's domain list.
> *
> @@ -502,7 +517,7 @@ static int arch_domain_mbm_alloc(u32 num_rmid, struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom)
> */
> static void domain_add_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> - int id = get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, r->cache_level);
> + int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->scope);
You can directly call
int id = get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, r->scope);
> struct list_head *add_pos = NULL;
> struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom;
> struct rdt_domain *d;
> @@ -552,7 +567,7 @@ static void domain_add_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>
> static void domain_remove_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> - int id = get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, r->cache_level);
> + int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->scope);
> struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom;
> struct rdt_domain *d;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
> index 458cb7419502..e79324676f57 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void pseudo_lock_region_clear(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
> static int pseudo_lock_region_init(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
> {
> struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci;
> + int cache_level;
> int ret;
> int i;
>
> @@ -296,8 +297,20 @@ static int pseudo_lock_region_init(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
>
> plr->size = rdtgroup_cbm_to_size(plr->s->res, plr->d, plr->cbm);
>
> + switch (plr->s->res->scope) {
> + case RESCTRL_L3_CACHE:
> + cache_level = 3;
> + break;
> + case RESCTRL_L2_CACHE:
> + cache_level = 2;
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
Again this may not be required.
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
> - if (ci->info_list[i].level == plr->s->res->cache_level) {
> + if (ci->info_list[i].level == cache_level) {
> plr->line_size = ci->info_list[i].coherency_line_size;
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 725344048f85..f510414bf6ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1343,12 +1343,25 @@ unsigned int rdtgroup_cbm_to_size(struct rdt_resource *r,
> {
> struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci;
> unsigned int size = 0;
> + int cache_level;
> int num_b, i;
>
> + switch (r->scope) {
> + case RESCTRL_L3_CACHE:
> + cache_level = 3;
> + break;
> + case RESCTRL_L2_CACHE:
> + cache_level = 2;
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return size;
> + }
Again this may not be required.
> +
> num_b = bitmap_weight(&cbm, r->cache.cbm_len);
> ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpumask_any(&d->cpu_mask));
> for (i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
> - if (ci->info_list[i].level == r->cache_level) {
> + if (ci->info_list[i].level == cache_level) {
> size = ci->info_list[i].size / r->cache.cbm_len * num_b;
> break;
> }
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists