[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6610548d-4b3a-49cb-83a2-b9047f96e03e@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 01:12:06 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/entry: remove unused argument %rsi passed to
exc_nmi()
On 9/27/2023 1:06 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * xin@...or.com <xin@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>
>>
>> exc_nmi() only takes one argument of type struct pt_regs *, but
>> asm_exc_nmi() calls it with 2 arguments. The second one passed
>> in %rsi seems a leftover, so simply remove it.
>>
>> BTW, fix 2 slips in the comments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com>
>> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@...or.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 10 ++++------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> I've split this into two patches, because the comment fixes
> are entirely unrelated to this patch.
>
> [ I've propagated the SOBs and Acked-by's to the two patches,
> as I presume is fine by everyone involved? ]
surely no problem at all!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists