[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07a9e3c1-0ed4-6f30-81c9-4eabcc11a18b@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:24:36 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@...il.com>,
Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] gpio: sprd: Modify the calculation method of eic
number
On 9/21/2023 5:00 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> When the soc changes, the corresponding gpio-eic-sprd.c
> code needs to be modified, and the corresponding
> Document must also be modified, which is quite troublesome.
> To avoid modifying the driver file, the number of EICs
> is automatically calculated by matching dts nodes.
>
> Fixes: 2788938b7946 ("gpio: eic-sprd: Make the irqchip immutable")
This is not a bugfix and you still use an incorrect Fixes tag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> index 96f1c7fd3988..e85addbdf8aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -100,33 +100,32 @@ struct sprd_eic {
>
> struct sprd_eic_variant_data {
> enum sprd_eic_type type;
> - u32 num_eics;
> };
>
> +#define SPRD_EIC_VAR_DATA(soc_name) \
> +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_dbnc_data = { \
> + .type = SPRD_EIC_DEBOUNCE, \
> +}; \
> + \
> +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_latch_data = { \
> + .type = SPRD_EIC_LATCH, \
> +}; \
> + \
> +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_async_data = { \
> + .type = SPRD_EIC_ASYNC, \
> +}; \
> + \
> +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_sync_data = { \
> + .type = SPRD_EIC_SYNC, \
> +}
> +
> +SPRD_EIC_VAR_DATA(sc9860);
> +
> static const char *sprd_eic_label_name[SPRD_EIC_MAX] = {
> "eic-debounce", "eic-latch", "eic-async",
> "eic-sync",
> };
>
> -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_dbnc_data = {
> - .type = SPRD_EIC_DEBOUNCE,
> - .num_eics = 8,
> -};
> -
> -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_latch_data = {
> - .type = SPRD_EIC_LATCH,
> - .num_eics = 8,
> -};
> -
> -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_async_data = {
> - .type = SPRD_EIC_ASYNC,
> - .num_eics = 8,
> -};
> -
> -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_sync_data = {
> - .type = SPRD_EIC_SYNC,
> - .num_eics = 8,
> -};
>
> static inline void __iomem *sprd_eic_offset_base(struct sprd_eic *sprd_eic,
> unsigned int bank)
> @@ -595,6 +594,7 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct sprd_eic *sprd_eic;
> struct resource *res;
> int ret, i;
> + u16 num_banks = 0;
>
> pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> if (!pdata) {
> @@ -625,12 +625,13 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> break;
>
> sprd_eic->base[i] = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> + num_banks++;
Please move this after the validation of the sprd_eic->base.
> if (IS_ERR(sprd_eic->base[i]))
> return PTR_ERR(sprd_eic->base[i]);
> }
>
> sprd_eic->chip.label = sprd_eic_label_name[sprd_eic->type];
> - sprd_eic->chip.ngpio = pdata->num_eics;
> + sprd_eic->chip.ngpio = num_banks * SPRD_EIC_PER_BANK_NR;
> sprd_eic->chip.base = -1;
> sprd_eic->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> sprd_eic->chip.direction_input = sprd_eic_direction_input;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists