[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mcq-0yWcYp6ksDF5RP-B+7b+r2KYh5onEMKx1tpS9O4hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:22:36 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
> > label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
> > own matching function.
>
> ...
>
> > +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> > +{
> > + return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> > +}
>
> I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.
>
Of course we can. Just bail out of gpiochip_add_data_with_key() if it
is. But that's material for a different patch.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists