linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 01:29:43 +0800
From:   Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
        wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, gbayer@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
        dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM
 extension and loopback-ism



On 2023/9/28 16:56, Alexandra Winter wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27.09.23 17:16, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>> Hello Wen Gu,
>>
>> I applied and built your patches and noticed some things that you may want to consider in the next version:
> 
> 
> FYI, patchwork basically complains about many the same issues:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=787037&state=*
> 
> In general you should run those check BEFORE you send the patches and not rely on patchwork.
Thank you Sandy. I seem to have not seen the specific content of these checks. May I ask how to
run those patchwork check locally? So that I can make sure everything is ok before send them.