lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35d861b5-eca0-c817-684c-e39a841f17db@tuxon.dev>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:01:44 +0300
From:   claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To:     Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>,
        sam@...nborg.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org, airlied@...il.com,
        daniel@...ll.ch, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, lee@...nel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com,
        Balamanikandan.Gunasundar@...rochip.com,
        Durai.ManickamKR@...rochip.com, Nayabbasha.Sayed@...rochip.com,
        Dharma.B@...rochip.com, Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com,
        Balakrishnan.S@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] drm: atmel-hlcdc: add flag and driver ops to
 differentiate XLCDC and HLCDC IP

Hi, Manikandan,

On 27.09.2023 12:47, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
> +void atmel_hlcdc_plane_setup_scaler(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +				    struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
> +void atmel_xlcdc_plane_setup_scaler(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +				    struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
> +void update_hlcdc_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +			  struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state,
> +			  u32 sr, int i);
> +void update_xlcdc_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +			  struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state,
> +			  u32 sr, int i);
> +void hlcdc_atomic_disable(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane);
> +void xlcdc_atomic_disable(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane);
> +void
> +atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_general_settings(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +					  struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
> +void
> +atmel_xlcdc_plane_update_general_settings(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +					  struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
> +void hlcdc_atomic_update(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +			 struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc);
> +void xlcdc_atomic_update(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +			 struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc);
> +void hlcdc_csc_init(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +		    const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
> +void xlcdc_csc_init(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +		    const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
> +void hlcdc_irq_dbg(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +		   const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
> +void xlcdc_irq_dbg(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> +		   const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
> +

These are still here... Isn't the solution I proposed to you in the
previous version good enough?

Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ