linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] drm: atmel-hlcdc: add flag and driver ops to differentiate XLCDC and HLCDC IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8b721bd5-187c-6aad-39ee-e9a5ded6cee5@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 04:18:38 +0000
From:   <Manikandan.M@...rochip.com>
To:     <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, <sam@...nborg.org>,
        <bbrezillon@...nel.org>, <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <lee@...nel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com>,
        <Balamanikandan.Gunasundar@...rochip.com>,
        <Durai.ManickamKR@...rochip.com>, <Nayabbasha.Sayed@...rochip.com>,
        <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>, <Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        <Balakrishnan.S@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] drm: atmel-hlcdc: add flag and driver ops to
 differentiate XLCDC and HLCDC IP

On 28/09/23 11:31 am, claudiu beznea wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi, Manikandan,
> 
> On 27.09.2023 12:47, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
>> +void atmel_hlcdc_plane_setup_scaler(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                                 struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
>> +void atmel_xlcdc_plane_setup_scaler(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                                 struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
>> +void update_hlcdc_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                       struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state,
>> +                       u32 sr, int i);
>> +void update_xlcdc_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                       struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state,
>> +                       u32 sr, int i);
>> +void hlcdc_atomic_disable(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane);
>> +void xlcdc_atomic_disable(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane);
>> +void
>> +atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_general_settings(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                                       struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
>> +void
>> +atmel_xlcdc_plane_update_general_settings(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                                       struct atmel_hlcdc_plane_state *state);
>> +void hlcdc_atomic_update(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                      struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc);
>> +void xlcdc_atomic_update(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                      struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc);
>> +void hlcdc_csc_init(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                 const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
>> +void xlcdc_csc_init(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                 const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
>> +void hlcdc_irq_dbg(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
>> +void xlcdc_irq_dbg(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> +                const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc);
>> +
> 
> These are still here... Isn't the solution I proposed to you in the
> previous version good enough?
Hi Claudiu

These changes were integrated in the current patch set based on the 
solution which you proposed in the previous series.
The XLCDC and HLCDC functions calls are moved to IP specific driver->ops
and their function declarations are made here in atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
Rest of the changes are integrated in Patch 4/7.
> 
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Manikandan M.