linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] serial: imx: Fix potential deadlock on sport->port.lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:08:15 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        jirislaby@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, sorganov@...il.com, festevam@...il.com,
        ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] serial: imx: Fix potential deadlock on
 sport->port.lock

On 28-09-23, 08:07, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> [Cc += Vinod Koul, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org]
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:19:39PM +0000, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> > As &sport->port.lock is acquired under irq context along the following
> > call chain from imx_uart_rtsint(), other acquisition of the same lock
> > inside process context or softirq context should disable irq avoid double
> > lock.
> > 
> > <deadlock #1>
> > 
> > imx_uart_dma_rx_callback()
> > --> spin_lock(&sport->port.lock)
> > <interrupt>
> >    --> imx_uart_rtsint()
> >    --> spin_lock(&sport->port.lock)
> > 
> > This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
> > developing for irq-related deadlock.
> 
> Ah, I understood before that you really experienced that deadlock (or a
> lockdep splat). I didn't test anything, but I think the
> imx_uart_dma_rx_callback() is called indirectly by
> sdma_update_channel_loop() which is called in irq context. I don't know
> if this is the case for all dma drivers?!
> 
> @Vinod: Maybe you can chime in here: Is a dma callback always called in
> irq context?

Not in callback but a tasklet context. The DMA irq handler is supposed
to use a tasklet for invoking the callback

> If yes, this patch isn't needed. Otherwise it might be a good idea to
> not use the special knowledge and switch to spin_lock_irqsave() as
> suggested.
> 
> > To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_irqsave()
> > on the &sport->port.lock inside imx_uart_dma_rx_callback() to prevent
> > the possible deadlock scenario.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
> 
> If we agree this patch is a good idea, we can add:
> 
> Fixes: 496a4471b7c3 ("serial: imx: work-around for hardware RX flood")
> 
> Thanks
> Uwe
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |



-- 
~Vinod