[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230928084436.fftw5sk4sixaedck@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:44:36 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: festevam@...il.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>,
sorganov@...il.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] serial: imx: Fix potential deadlock on
sport->port.lock
Hello Vinod,
thanks for your quick answer!
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 01:08:15PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 28-09-23, 08:07, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > [Cc += Vinod Koul, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:19:39PM +0000, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> > > As &sport->port.lock is acquired under irq context along the following
> > > call chain from imx_uart_rtsint(), other acquisition of the same lock
> > > inside process context or softirq context should disable irq avoid double
> > > lock.
> > >
> > > <deadlock #1>
> > >
> > > imx_uart_dma_rx_callback()
> > > --> spin_lock(&sport->port.lock)
> > > <interrupt>
> > > --> imx_uart_rtsint()
> > > --> spin_lock(&sport->port.lock)
> > >
> > > This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
> > > developing for irq-related deadlock.
> >
> > Ah, I understood before that you really experienced that deadlock (or a
> > lockdep splat). I didn't test anything, but I think the
> > imx_uart_dma_rx_callback() is called indirectly by
> > sdma_update_channel_loop() which is called in irq context. I don't know
> > if this is the case for all dma drivers?!
> >
> > @Vinod: Maybe you can chime in here: Is a dma callback always called in
> > irq context?
>
> Not in callback but a tasklet context. The DMA irq handler is supposed
> to use a tasklet for invoking the callback
So drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c is bogous as it calls
-> sdma_int_handler()
-> sdma_update_channel_loop()
-> dmaengine_desc_get_callback_invoke()
resulting in imx_uart_dma_rx_callback() (and others) being called in irq
context, right?
In that case:
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
(for the imx-UART patch that stops assuming imx_uart_dma_rx_callback()
is called with irqs off).
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists