[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50069cc01dc978f33c9196f91cd238d3307d27fb.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:41:47 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: x86: add more information to kvm_exit
tracepoint
On 2023-09-26 у 18:40 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 9/24/23 14:44, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > + __field( bool, guest_mode ) \
> > + __field( u64, requests ) \
> > + __field( bool, req_imm_exit ) \
>
> I am not sure about adding guest_mode or req_imm_exit here, because they
> should always match kvm_entry.
>
> Paolo
>
I'll drop both.
Best regards,
Maxim levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists