linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: add more information to the kvm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:41:30 +0300
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: add more information to the kvm_entry
 tracepoint

У вт, 2023-09-26 у 18:39 +0200, Paolo Bonzini пише:
> On 9/24/23 14:44, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > +		__field(	u32,		inj_info	)
> > +		__field(	u32,		inj_info_err	)
> > +		__field(	bool,		guest_mode	)
> > +		__field(	bool,		req_imm_exit	)
> > +		),
> 
> As anticipated in patch 1 I'm not so sure about adding req_imm_exit here 
> but also (especially) in kvm_exit.  I do believe it should be traced, 
> I'm not sure it's needed in kvm_entry+kvm_exit as opposed to just a 
> separate tracepoint.


I will drop guest_mode.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


> 
> Paolo
>