linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: ISST: Use fuse enabled mask instead of allowed levels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7dd52e2438d3c401a123e483adc5d881579d545d.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 Sep 2023 05:48:42 -0700
From:   srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, markgross@...nel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: ISST: Use fuse enabled mask instead
 of allowed levels

On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 15:14 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> 
> > Allowed level mask is a mask of levels, which are currently allowed
> > to dynamically switch. But even dynamic switching is not allowed,
> 
> even if ?
OK

> 
> > user should be able to check all parameters for selection via BIOS.
> 
> I think you're lacking a negation in the above paragraph because it
> sounds 
> like there's an internal contradiction in it. Can you please take a
> look.

I can try to improve.

>