linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add SM8550 CAMCC yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 30 Sep 2023 16:15:50 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        andersson@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        jonathan@...ek.ca, quic_tdas@...cinc.com,
        vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add SM8550 CAMCC yaml

On 30/09/2023 15:41, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The SM8550 should have its own yaml description file, not be listed as a
> compatible string of the SM8450 CAMCC driver since SM8450 and SM8550
> have separate CAMCC drivers.

Linux driver architecture does not shape bindings. If devices are
similar, it does not matter that you have two drivers. It was never a
valid reason to split bindings.


Best regards,
Krzysztof