linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when RCU-freeing objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2023 13:11:31 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when
 RCU-freeing objects

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 05:46:56PM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> 
> Since the actual slab freeing is deferred when calling kvfree_rcu(), so
> is the kmemleak_free() callback informing kmemleak of the object
> deletion. From the perspective of the kvfree_rcu() caller, the object is
> freed and it may remove any references to it. Since kmemleak does not
> scan RCU internal data storing the pointer, it will report such objects
> as leaks during the grace period.
> 
> Tell kmemleak to ignore such objects on the kvfree_call_rcu() path. Note
> that the tiny RCU implementation does not have such issue since the
> objects can be tracked from the rcu_ctrlblk structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/F903A825-F05F-4B77-A2B5-7356282FBA2C@apple.com/
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index cb1caefa8bd0..24423877962c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  #include <linux/panic.h>
>  #include <linux/panic_notifier.h>
> @@ -3388,6 +3389,14 @@ void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
>  		success = true;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The kvfree_rcu() caller considers the pointer freed at this point
> +	 * and likely removes any references to it. Since the actual slab
> +	 * freeing (and kmemleak_free()) is deferred, tell kmemleak to ignore
> +	 * this object (no scanning or false positives reporting).
> +	 */
> +	kmemleak_ignore(ptr);
> +
>  	// Set timer to drain after KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES.
>  	if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING)
>  		schedule_delayed_monitor_work(krcp);
> -- 
> 2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog
>