linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when RCU-freeing objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230930174657.800551-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:46:56 +0000
From:   "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when RCU-freeing objects

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

Since the actual slab freeing is deferred when calling kvfree_rcu(), so
is the kmemleak_free() callback informing kmemleak of the object
deletion. From the perspective of the kvfree_rcu() caller, the object is
freed and it may remove any references to it. Since kmemleak does not
scan RCU internal data storing the pointer, it will report such objects
as leaks during the grace period.

Tell kmemleak to ignore such objects on the kvfree_call_rcu() path. Note
that the tiny RCU implementation does not have such issue since the
objects can be tracked from the rcu_ctrlblk structure.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/F903A825-F05F-4B77-A2B5-7356282FBA2C@apple.com/
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index cb1caefa8bd0..24423877962c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/panic.h>
 #include <linux/panic_notifier.h>
@@ -3388,6 +3389,14 @@ void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
 		success = true;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * The kvfree_rcu() caller considers the pointer freed at this point
+	 * and likely removes any references to it. Since the actual slab
+	 * freeing (and kmemleak_free()) is deferred, tell kmemleak to ignore
+	 * this object (no scanning or false positives reporting).
+	 */
+	kmemleak_ignore(ptr);
+
 	// Set timer to drain after KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES.
 	if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING)
 		schedule_delayed_monitor_work(krcp);
-- 
2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog