[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05b03f3e-5863-4d33-8c70-03be7d7e972f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:23:44 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Eckert.Florian@...glemail.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pavel@....cz, kabel@...nel.org,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] trigger: ledtrig-tty: move variable definition to
the top
On 04. 10. 23, 8:37, Florian Eckert wrote:
> On 2023-10-03 07:00, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 02. 10. 23, 16:05, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2023, Florian Eckert wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Intel build robot has complained about this. Hence move the commit
>>>> of the variable definition to the beginning of the function.
>
>>> Please copy the robot's error message into the commit message.
>
> For a v3 patch-set I will add the error message from build robot.
>
> Build robot output of my v1 change:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20230926093607.59536-1-fe@dev.tdt.de/T/#m777371c5de8fadc505a833139b8ae69ac7fa8dab
>
> I decided to move the variable definition with a separate commit
> to the top of the function, to make the build robot happy. After that
> I made my changes for v2 to the ledtrig-tty to add the feature.
>
>> Ah, lkp, then also the Closes: line as it suggests.
>
> Sorry I do not understand your statement
The link you pasted above states:
=======
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new
version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270440.IJB24Xap-lkp@intel.com/
=======
So please follow that suggestion ;).
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists