linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] trigger: ledtrig-tty: move variable definition to the top

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d59855493baa936485a2b00aa29d0449@dev.tdt.de>
Date:   Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:36:09 +0200
From:   Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Eckert.Florian@...glemail.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pavel@....cz, kabel@...nel.org,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] trigger: ledtrig-tty: move variable definition to
 the top



>> I decided to move the variable definition with a separate commit
>> to the top of the function, to make the build robot happy. After that
>> I made my changes for v2 to the ledtrig-tty to add the feature.
>> 
>>> Ah, lkp, then also the Closes: line as it suggests.
>> 
>> Sorry I do not understand your statement
> 
> The link you pasted above states:
> =======
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new 
> version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270440.IJB24Xap-lkp@intel.com/
> =======
> 
> So please follow that suggestion ;).

Ok, I understand, thanks will to this on a v3 patchset.
I will now wait for the comments of my changes in ledtrig-tty from the 
led subsystem.
And then I will send a new patch set with the requested changes.

Sorry for the silly question. But do I have to send this patch again for 
a v3?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/f41dc1e1-6d34-48b2-97dd-ba67df6003c6@kernel.org/T/#u
It was already marked by you with a `Reviewed-by:` from you?

--
Best regards
Florian