linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] perf: fix spelling mistake "parametrized" -> "parameterized"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXO6+Cgvo4BmC9fgL70FY+ciPjRVR5qghxYBR3VSB7WNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:07:00 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
        Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf: fix spelling mistake "parametrized" -> "parameterized"

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 12:49 AM Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There are spelling mistakes in comments and a pr_debug message. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>

+ Athira Rajeev

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c        | 4 ++--
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> index f78be21a5999..e52f45c7c3d1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> @@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
>                         if (strchr(ent->d_name, '.'))
>                                 continue;
>
> -                       /* exclude parametrized ones (name contains '?') */
> +                       /* exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?') */
>                         n = snprintf(pmu_event, sizeof(pmu_event), "%s%s", path, ent->d_name);
>                         if (n >= PATH_MAX) {
>                                 pr_err("pmu event name crossed PATH_MAX(%d) size\n", PATH_MAX);
> @@ -2578,7 +2578,7 @@ static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
>                         fclose(file);
>
>                         if (is_event_parameterized == 1) {
> -                               pr_debug("skipping parametrized PMU event: %s which contains ?\n", pmu_event);
> +                               pr_debug("skipping parameterized PMU event: %s which contains ?\n", pmu_event);
>                                 continue;
>                         }
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
> index c77955419173..d2a3506e0d19 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>
>  set -e
>
> -# Test all PMU events; however exclude parametrized ones (name contains '?')
> +# Test all PMU events; however exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?')
>  for p in $(perf list --raw-dump pmu | sed 's/[[:graph:]]\+?[[:graph:]]\+[[:space:]]//g'); do
>    echo "Testing $p"
>    result=$(perf stat -e "$p" true 2>&1)
> --
> 2.39.2
>