linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] jfs : fs array-index-out-of-bounds in txCommit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3d4e0f62-35bb-4b18-a64c-191c88415032@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2023 10:45:49 +0530
From:   Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@...il.com>
To:     Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>, shaggy@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzbot+0558d19c373e44da3c18@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs : fs array-index-out-of-bounds in txCommit

On 04/10/23 00:46, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> The size of the xad array can be either XTROOTMAXSLOT or XTPAGEMAXSLOT 
> depending on whether it is the root, imbedded in the inode, or not. It 
> is currently declared with the smaller value so we can use xtpage_t 
> within the inode.
>
> I had promised to address this, but haven't gotten to it yet. I'll try 
> to carve out some time to do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaggy

Can you guide with the workflow of how things should be done. I can try 
to work on it and resolve the issue.