linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver base: slience unused warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ceaa146a-2781-4266-ade8-6a25eb39abbf@kadam.mountain>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:44:09 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc:     Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver base: slience unused warning

This is a W=1 static checker warning.  We've already reviewed it, and
marked it as old.  There isn't anything else required.

Or are we close to promoting the unused-but-set-variable warning from
W=1 to being on by default?  How many of these warnings are remaining?
It it's like only 20-50 warnings left then maybe we should consider the
other options but that kind of information needs to be in the cover
letter or otherwise we won't know about it.

regards,
dan carpenter