linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver base: slience unused warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2310061312460.20732@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 13:27:23 +0100 (BST)
From:   "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
cc:     Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver base: slience unused warning

On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> This is a W=1 static checker warning.  We've already reviewed it, and
> marked it as old.  There isn't anything else required.

 Good point.

> Or are we close to promoting the unused-but-set-variable warning from
> W=1 to being on by default?  How many of these warnings are remaining?
> It it's like only 20-50 warnings left then maybe we should consider the
> other options but that kind of information needs to be in the cover
> letter or otherwise we won't know about it.

 Hmm, these warnings do help chasing dead code, which in turn may reveal 
real issues, such as where someone missed or forgot something when writing 
their code and a value that was supposed to be used somehow is instead 
discarded.

 Most commonly it will be the case when some code has been deliberately 
removed as it evolves and a part that is no longer needed has been missed 
by chance and left in place.  I've seen it happen.  Apart from the code 
sloppiness resulting it shouldn't matter that much though as the compiler 
is usually pretty good at discarding dead code.

  Maciej