linux-kernel - Re: PPS functionality for Intel Timed I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZR/Gs3q1JfJ3pCky@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 11:34:59 +0300
From:   "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
Cc:     "N, Pandith" <pandith.n@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>,
        "D, Lakshmi Sowjanya" <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com>,
        "T R, Thejesh Reddy" <thejesh.reddy.t.r@...el.com>,
        "Hall, Christopher S" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
        "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@...el.com>
Subject: Re: PPS functionality for Intel Timed I/O

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:34:10AM +0300, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > On 06/10/23 07:31, N, Pandith wrote:
> > > > From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:16 PM
> > > > On 15/02/23 08:09, N, Pandith wrote:

[snip]

> > > > Regarding Documentation/driver-api/pps.rst let me suggest you to prose a
> > > > separate patch to rewrite the Generators section in such a way you easily can add
> > > > your solution at the end. A possible example is attached but feel free to rewrite it
> > > > according to your needs.
> > > > 
> > > Ok, we are updating documentation as you have suggested as a separate patch.
> > > Can we use your "Signed-off-by" tag for attached patch.
> > 
> > If you just followed my suggestion then it's OK for me.
> 
> But can we have your SoB or not? If so, please provide it explicitly as
> the (Linux kernel) process requires.

Or even better if you provide the patch itself or apply directly to your tree
that we can rebase the our stuff on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko