linux-kernel - Re: PPS functionality for Intel Timed I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <633ea9ab-7d86-33c7-f20c-6b7be945750a@enneenne.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 10:57:37 +0200
From:   Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To:     "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "N, Pandith" <pandith.n@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>,
        "D, Lakshmi Sowjanya" <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com>,
        "T R, Thejesh Reddy" <thejesh.reddy.t.r@...el.com>,
        "Hall, Christopher S" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
        "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@...el.com>
Subject: Re: PPS functionality for Intel Timed I/O

On 06/10/23 10:34, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:34:10AM +0300, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
>>> On 06/10/23 07:31, N, Pandith wrote:
>>>>> From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:16 PM
>>>>> On 15/02/23 08:09, N, Pandith wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>>>> Regarding Documentation/driver-api/pps.rst let me suggest you to prose a
>>>>> separate patch to rewrite the Generators section in such a way you easily can add
>>>>> your solution at the end. A possible example is attached but feel free to rewrite it
>>>>> according to your needs.
>>>>>
>>>> Ok, we are updating documentation as you have suggested as a separate patch.
>>>> Can we use your "Signed-off-by" tag for attached patch.
>>>
>>> If you just followed my suggestion then it's OK for me.
>>
>> But can we have your SoB or not? If so, please provide it explicitly as
>> the (Linux kernel) process requires.
> 
> Or even better if you provide the patch itself or apply directly to your tree
> that we can rebase the our stuff on.

Just send the patch to the kernel mail list and, if OK, I'm going to sign it and 
forwarding to Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@...ux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti