linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/xen: ignore the VCPU_SSHOTTMR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f0524bd4-11a1-415e-b2f8-645241a63afe@xen.org>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:40:30 +0100
From:   Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/xen: ignore the VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future flag

On 06/10/2023 02:48, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> On 04/10/2023 19:30, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>>> ---
>>>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
>>>> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>>>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>>>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>>>
>>> If you're going to manually Cc folks, put the Cc's in the changelog proper so that
>>> there's a record of who was Cc'd on the patch.
>>>
>>
>> FTR, the basic list was generated:
>>
>> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --no-rolestats
>> 0001-KVM-xen-ignore-the-VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future-flag.patch | while read line;
>> do echo Cc: $line; done
>>
>> and then lightly hacked put x86 at the end and remove my own name... so not
>> really manual.
>> Also not entirely sure why you'd want the Cc list making it into the actual
>> commit.
> 
> It's useful for Cc's that *don't* come from get_maintainers, as it provides a
> record in the commit of who was Cc'd on a patch.
> 
> E.g. if someone encounters an issue with a commit, the Cc records provide additional
> contacts that might be able to help sort things out.
> 
> Or if a maintainer further up the stream has questions or concerns about a pull
> request, they can use the Cc list to grab the right audience for a discussion,
> or be more confident in merging the request because the maintainer knows that the
> "right" people at least saw the patch.
> 
> Lore links provide much of that functionality, but following a link is almost
> always slower, and some maintainers are allergic to web browsers :-)
> 

Ok... makes sense.

>>> Or even better, just use scripts/get_maintainers.pl and only manually Cc people
>>> when necessary.
>>
>> I guess this must be some other way of using get_maintainers.pl that you are
>> expecting?
> 
> Ah, I was just assuming that you were handcoding the Cc "list", but it sounds
> like you're piping the results into each patch.  That's fine, just a bit noisy
> and uncommon.
> 
> FWIW, my scripts gather the To/Cc for all patches in a series, and then use the
> results for the entire series, e.g.
> 
>    git send-email --confirm=always --suppress-cc=all $to $bcc $cc ...
> 
> That way everyone that gets sent mail gets all patches in a series.  Most
> contributors, myself included, don't like to receive bits and pieces of a series,
> e.g. it makes doing quick triage/reviews annoying, especially if the patches I
> didn't receive weren't sent to any of the mailing list to which I'm subscribed.

Ok, I'll send stuff that way in future. Thanks,

   Paul