[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5984411.lOV4Wx5bFT@radijator>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 15:08:42 +0200
From: Duje Mihanović <duje.mihanovic@...le.hr>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: backlight: add Kinetic KTD2801 binding
On Friday, October 6, 2023 2:30:14 PM CEST Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > + enable-gpios:
> > + maxItems: 1
>
> Why "enable"? This is the line we are going to us to bitbang the
> ExpressWire protocol. Doesn't that make it a control or data pin?
I named it "enable" because the KTD253 driver does so too, but also because
that pin is also used to power down the IC. If "enable" isn't right
regardless, is just "gpios" fine for this?
Regards,
Duje
Powered by blists - more mailing lists