[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231007082125.4699-1-xingtong_wu@163.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 16:21:25 +0800
From: Xing Tong Wu <xingtong_wu@....com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xingtong.wu@...mens.com
Cc: jan.kiszka@...mens.com, tobias.schaffner@...mens.com,
cedric.hombourger@...mens.com, gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: wdat_wdt: Add timeout value as a param in ping method
From: Xing Tong Wu <xingtong.wu@...mens.com>
According to the WDAT spec that states about WATCHDOG_ACTION_SET_COUNTDOWN_PERIOD:
"This action is required if WATCHDOG_ACTION_RESET does not explicitly write a new
countdown value to a register during a reset."
And that implies, WATCHDOG_ACTION_RESET may write a countdown value, thus may come
with a WATCHDOG_INSTRUCTION_WRITE_COUNTDOWN, thus need the timeout value as parameter
or would otherwise write 0.
The watchdog for SIONCT6126 need a entry WATCHDOG_INSTRUCTION_WRITE_COUNTDOWN for
WATCHDOG_ACTION_RESET action, I send this patch to support it.
Signed-off-by: Xing Tong Wu <xingtong.wu@...mens.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c
index 0ba99bed59fc..650fdc7996e1 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int wdat_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
static int wdat_wdt_ping(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
{
- return wdat_wdt_run_action(to_wdat_wdt(wdd), ACPI_WDAT_RESET, 0, NULL);
+ return wdat_wdt_run_action(to_wdat_wdt(wdd), ACPI_WDAT_RESET, wdd->timeout, NULL);
}
static int wdat_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists