linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] samples: kprobes: Fixes a typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231007153900.GA20160@atom0118>
Date:   Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
From:   Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@...il.com>
To:     naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] samples: kprobes: Fixes a typo

On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > Fixes typo in a function name.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > index cbf16542d84e..ed79fd3d48fb 100644
> > --- a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > +++ b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct my_data {
> >  	ktime_t entry_stamp;
> >  };
> >  
> > -/* Here we use the entry_hanlder to timestamp function entry */
> > +/* Here we use the entry_handler to timestamp function entry */
> >  static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >  	struct my_data *data;
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> 	Hi all, can someone provide comments on this change.

			Hi all, can someone please review this change. It has been not
			reviewed for quite some time.