linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] samples: kfifo: Fixes a typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231007154135.GB20160@atom0118>
Date:   Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:11:35 +0530
From:   Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@...il.com>
To:     stefani@...bold.net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] samples: kfifo: Fixes a typo

On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:02:02PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:06:36PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > Fixes a typo in a comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  samples/kfifo/dma-example.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/samples/kfifo/dma-example.c b/samples/kfifo/dma-example.c
> > index 0cf27483cb36..112b0e427199 100644
> > --- a/samples/kfifo/dma-example.c
> > +++ b/samples/kfifo/dma-example.c
> > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int __init example_init(void)
> >  			break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* put here your code to setup and exectute the dma operation */
> > +	/* put here your code to setup and execute the dma operation */
> >  	/* ... */
> >  
> >  	/* example: zero bytes received */
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int __init example_init(void)
> >  			break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* put here your code to setup and exectute the dma operation */
> > +	/* put here your code to setup and execute the dma operation */
> >  	/* ... */
> >  
> >  	/* example: 5 bytes transmitted */
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> 	Hi all, can someone review this change ?

			Hi all can someone please review this change ?