linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Test pinning bpf timer to a core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0e31e33b-adab-3d4e-be45-f9d5231fdc11@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Sun, 8 Oct 2023 12:23:17 +0800
From:   Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>
To:     David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Test pinning bpf timer to
 a core



On 10/5/2023 12:23 AM, David Vernet wrote:
> Now that we support pinning a BPF timer to the current core, we should
> test it with some selftests. This patch adds two new testcases to the
> timer suite, which verifies that a BPF timer both with and without
> BPF_F_TIMER_ABS, can be pinned to the calling core with
> BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN.
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>