[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169686242326.26391.4445179958402601494.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 14:40:23 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Add ability to pin bpf timer to calling
CPU
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 11:23:37 -0500 you wrote:
> BPF supports creating high resolution timers using bpf_timer_* helper
> functions. Currently, only the BPF_F_TIMER_ABS flag is supported, which
> specifies that the timeout should be interpreted as absolute time. It
> would also be useful to be able to pin that timer to a core. For
> example, if you wanted to make a subset of cores run without timer
> interrupts, and only have the timer be invoked on a single core.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Add ability to pin bpf timer to calling CPU
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d6247ecb6c1e
- [bpf-next,v2,2/2] bpf/selftests: Test pinning bpf timer to a core
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0d7ae0686075
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists