linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: ov8858: Don't set fwnode in the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3if2lurlnceoddef64qdahztus6ysyaz333x6ty3agzqqrugxo@sowcvbdf2tqe>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 09:32:28 +0200
From:   Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>
To:     Ondřej Jirman <megi@....cz>
Cc:     linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>,
        Nicholas Roth <nicholas@...hemail.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "open list:V4L2 CAMERA SENSOR DRIVERS" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: ov8858: Don't set fwnode in the driver

Hi Ondřej,

On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 03:00:00PM +0200, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> From: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>
> This makes the driver work with the new check in
> v4l2_async_register_subdev() that was introduced recently in 6.6-rc1.
> Without this change, probe fails with:
>
> ov8858 1-0036: Detected OV8858 sensor, revision 0xb2
> ov8858 1-0036: sub-device fwnode is an endpoint!
> ov8858 1-0036: v4l2 async register subdev failed
> ov8858: probe of 1-0036 failed with error -22
>
> This also simplifies the driver a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c
> index 3af6125a2eee..b862dc9604cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c
> @@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ static int ov8858_parse_of(struct ov8858 *ov8858)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>
> -	ov8858->subdev.fwnode = endpoint;
> +	fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);

ov8858_parse_of() could be further simplified with:

--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8858.c
@@ -1850,9 +1850,9 @@ static int ov8858_parse_of(struct ov8858 *ov8858)
        }

        ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(endpoint, &vep);
+       fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);
        if (ret) {
                dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse endpoint: %d\n", ret);
-               fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);
                return ret;
        }

@@ -1864,12 +1864,9 @@ static int ov8858_parse_of(struct ov8858 *ov8858)
        default:
                dev_err(dev, "Unsupported number of data lanes %u\n",
                        ov8858->num_lanes);
-               fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);
                return -EINVAL;
        }

-       ov8858->subdev.fwnode = endpoint;
-
        return 0;
 }

 Do you think it's worth doing so ?

>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ static int ov8858_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
>  	ret = ov8858_init_ctrls(ov8858);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err_put_fwnode;
> +		return ret;
>
>  	sd = &ov8858->subdev;
>  	sd->flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;
> @@ -1964,8 +1964,6 @@ static int ov8858_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	media_entity_cleanup(&sd->entity);
>  err_free_handler:
>  	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&ov8858->ctrl_handler);
> -err_put_fwnode:
> -	fwnode_handle_put(ov8858->subdev.fwnode);
>
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1978,7 +1976,6 @@ static void ov8858_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(sd);
>  	media_entity_cleanup(&sd->entity);
>  	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&ov8858->ctrl_handler);
> -	fwnode_handle_put(ov8858->subdev.fwnode);
>
>  	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>  	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))

The rest looks good!

Thanks
  j

> --
> 2.42.0
>